Published Mar 2, 2017

Erosion can be stopped

Metso’s Jussi Hellman says that new material options can prevent erosion and corrosion at an acceptable cost

Jussi HellmanMr. Hellman has a little presentation that will probably send a shiver down the spine of all valve engineers. The title is straightforward enough – “challenging erosion” – and the first page gives a nice summary of various types of erosion, such as particle erosion, droplet erosion and erosioncorrosion. But it is the next few pages that are rather unsettling, as they feature images showing the effects of erosion in valves. How about a photo of a butterfly valve used in lime sludge, in which the disk has all but disappeared? That’s followed by a control valve in which sand particles have eaten away a significant portion of the cage. And last but by no means least, the final image shows that even a ceramiclined ball valve can be destroyed, this time by mixed oxide particles in a slurry service. “It’s not all doom and gloom,” comments Mr. Hellman. “Many of the problems associated with erosion in valves can be controlled with proper selection and sizing, whilst alternative materials of construction can be a solution for more severe applications.”

Of course, changing from a standard material such as carbon steel to solid stainless steel can cause a significant price increase, and the rise becomes even more dramatic if a nickel alloy or a wear resistant material is required. And whilst clad valves can offer corrosion resistance at a more acceptable cost, Mr. Hellman notes there can be issues associated with defects or discontinuities. “This is why Metso is constantly looking to develop and apply new materials, such as our bi-metal valves.” In many ways the bi-metal solution has objectives similar to weld overlay valves. There’s a shell made of a ductile, inexpensive valve construction material to provide the necessary wall thickness as designated by the applicable standards. Then there’s an inner material that offers better corrosion and/or erosion resistance. However, what Metso have done with the bi-metal valves is to develop a process whereby the inner material is applied in a single step which results in a perfect, reliable bond, stresses Mr. Hellman. “There are no pores or cracks that are often associated with weld overlay.

“There are no pores or cracks that are often associated with weld overlay”

Moreover, the inner material retains its uniform chemical composition, so there is no dilution layer which you find in welds.” The process is relatively new, but Metso have already compiled some persuasive case histories. Mr. Hellman: “for example, in one application an end user asked us to review we saw that the previous valve would fail every six months. We installed a bimetallic valve about eighteen months ago and it is still working fine.” Finally, asked about the cost of the bi-metal valves Mr. Hellman says that potential buyers need to look beyond the purchase price. “It is important to consider the total cost of ownership, and especially the financial benefits of additional uptime for the plant. Within that context the bi-metal valve is practically a bargain!”

The header image shows a close-up of the port in a Neles QX-T5 ball valve, which successfully uses a bi-metal construction.

Jussi Hellman in Profile:

Age: 45 • Education: M.Sc. in physical metallurgy and materials science • Career: Manager of materials engineering and product development in several business areas in Metso Corporation since 2002. Before that (1995-2001) project manager and head of research group in Helsinki University of Technology, where also part-time lecturer (1995-2015) • Current role: Materials engineering manager at Metso Flow Control Inc • Hobbies: Sheepdogs and carpentry


TEXT: David Sear

Published in Valve World magazine March 2017.

Related products